Just released information on their new plane.

http://cessna.com/news/article.chtml?ID=QPMCcHycS82nH3LYmVotPNMnptBUrfPyQ mdJUh6JfkkJNoEMTK

Larry Fitzgerald

wrote:
> Just released information on their new plane.
>
> http://cessna.com/news/article.chtml?ID=QPMCcHycS82nH3LYmVotPNMnptBUrfPyQ mdJUh6JfkkJNoEMTK
>
> Larry Fitzgerald

IMHO, The best thing about Cessna getting into the LSA market is not the
aircraft they will produce. The more important aspect is that it lends a
certain amount of legitimacy to LSA.

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:19:27 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
<wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net> wrote:

>IMHO, The best thing about Cessna getting into the LSA market is not the
>aircraft they will produce. The more important aspect is that it lends a
>certain amount of legitimacy to LSA.

....and will generate a nice healthy batch of used ~ 100 HP engines for the small
homebuilders to install. A-65s are getting pretty long in the tooth.

Ron Wanttaja

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:19:27 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
> <wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>IMHO, The best thing about Cessna getting into the LSA market is not the
>>aircraft they will produce. The more important aspect is that it lends a
>>certain amount of legitimacy to LSA.
>
>
> ...and will generate a nice healthy batch of used ~ 100 HP engines for the small
> homebuilders to install. A-65s are getting pretty long in the tooth.
>
> Ron Wanttaja
>

The one in the T-Cart I used to fly was built in 1939.

Still runs just fine.

On Jul 10, 7:23 pm, cavelamb himself > wrote:
> Ron Wanttaja wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:19:27 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
> > <wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>IMHO, The best thing about Cessna getting into the LSA market is not the
> >>aircraft they will produce. The more important aspect is that it lends a
> >>certain amount of legitimacy to LSA.
>
> > ...and will generate a nice healthy batch of used ~ 100 HP engines for the small
> > homebuilders to install. A-65s are getting pretty long in the tooth.
>
> > Ron Wanttaja
>
> The one in the T-Cart I used to fly was built in 1939.
>
> Still runs just fine.

Mine's a 1946. Just finished regrinding the crank. Getting
plenty tired otherwise.

Dan

wrote:

> On Jul 10, 7:23 pm, cavelamb himself > wrote:
>
>>Ron Wanttaja wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:19:27 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
>>><wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>IMHO, The best thing about Cessna getting into the LSA market is not the
>>>>aircraft they will produce. The more important aspect is that it lends a
>>>>certain amount of legitimacy to LSA.
>>
>>>...and will generate a nice healthy batch of used ~ 100 HP engines for the small
>>>homebuilders to install. A-65s are getting pretty long in the tooth.
>>
>>>Ron Wanttaja
>>
>>The one in the T-Cart I used to fly was built in 1939.
>>
>>Still runs just fine.
>
>
> Mine's a 1946. Just finished regrinding the crank. Getting
> plenty tired otherwise.
>
> Dan
>

Well, it did get four new jugs.

One at a time...

Richard

"Ron Wanttaja" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:19:27 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
> <wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net> wrote:
>
>>IMHO, The best thing about Cessna getting into the LSA market is not the
>>aircraft they will produce. The more important aspect is that it lends a
>>certain amount of legitimacy to LSA.
>
> ...and will generate a nice healthy batch of used ~ 100 HP engines for the
> small
> homebuilders to install. A-65s are getting pretty long in the tooth.
>

Ron-
I was looking at one of your books in Borders last night, and then wondered
if I can get one direct from you, signed by the author?

On Jul 10, 8:16 pm, Ron Wanttaja > wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:19:27 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
>
> <wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net> wrote:
> >IMHO, The best thing about Cessna getting into the LSA market is not the
> >aircraft they will produce. The more important aspect is that it lends a
> >certain amount of legitimacy to LSA.
>
> ...and will generate a nice healthy batch of used ~ 100 HP engines for the small
> homebuilders to install. A-65s are getting pretty long in the tooth.
>

The last thing a modern experimental needs is an "AIRCRAFT ENGINE".

A modern "AIRCRAFT ENGINE" is a P&W PT-6. Half a mil last time I
checked.

Piston aircraft engines made for that purpose are museum pieces.

The Harley Davidson V-twin is also a museum piece, but it's a museum
piece made in some considerable quantity, and it will put out more
sustained power longer than any Continental before the 0-200, and the
engine with a belt redrive is, if overpriced, at least something you
can count on parts being available for for awhile, from NON-AVIATION
sources.

Aviation means turbine and corporate money. It basically did in 1980,
and it almost exclusively does today, and it absolutely will tomorrow
unless there is a massive change from globalism and outsourcing and
the extirpation of the middle class in America. LSA is a sop to keep a
few cranks quiet, and if you buy some thing designed just for that
market you can expect it to be both heinously expensive and all of a
sudden not available when you need it.

Motorcycles and little airplanes were niche items for nuts in 1950.
The bikers had Evel and Sonny and the aviators had a Polack in
Milwaukee. Funny how it worked, accordions went out of favor, and so
did little airplanes.

"Bret Ludwig" > wrote

> The Harley Davidson V-twin is also a museum piece, but it's a museum
> piece made in some considerable quantity, and it will put out more
> sustained power longer than any Continental before the 0-200, and the
> engine with a belt redrive is, if overpriced, at least something you
> can count on parts being available for for awhile, from NON-AVIATION
> sources.

Check your facts. The Harley engine that makes 100 HP is a modified engine,
and therefore unlikely to be able to come close to sustained 100 HP on an
extended time period test.
--
Jim in NC